Becoming a “Problem Bear”: Everyday Multispecies Coexistence in an Alpine Rewilding Context – A Work in Progress

Abstract ID: 3.147
| Accepted as Talk
| TBA
| TBA
Köhler, M. (1,2)
(1) University of Augsburg, Institute of Geography, Chair of Human Geography and Transformation Research, Universitätsstraße 2, 86159 Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
(2) University of Augsburg, Green Office, Universitätsstraße 2, 86159 Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
How to cite: Köhler, M.: Becoming a “Problem Bear”: Everyday Multispecies Coexistence in an Alpine Rewilding Context – A Work in Progress, #RMC26-3.147
Categories: No categories defined
Keywords: Multispecies coexistence, Rewilding, Large Carnivores, More-than-human Geography
Categories: No categories defined
Keywords: Multispecies coexistence, Rewilding, Large Carnivores, More-than-human Geography
Abstract
The content was (partly) adapted by AI
Download
Download
Content (partly) adapted by AI

The return of large predators to Alpine regions has intensified debates about coexistence, responsibility, and the meaning of wilderness in densely inhabited mountain landscapes. In the context of contemporary rewilding initiatives, coexistence is increasingly framed as a relational and participatory process shaped by governance arrangements, local knowledge, and everyday practices. At the same time, tensions persist between policy aspirations, management categories, and the lived realities of humans and nonhuman animals sharing space.

This paper presents a work in progress from an ongoing PhD project on human–bear coexistence in the Italian Alps, focusing on the Autonomous Province of Trentino. Following the reintroduction of brown bears through the LIFE Ursus translocation project in the late 1990s, Trentino has become a particularly instructive site for examining the long-term dynamics of rewilding and multispecies coexistence with large carnivores. Drawing on more-than-human geography and multispecies approaches within the Environmental Humanities, the paper conceptualises coexistence as a dynamic, seasonal, and spatially situated process co-produced by humans, bears, institutions, infrastructures, and cultural narratives.

The paper draws on early-stage empirical work and reflects on the conceptual and methodological challenges of studying multispecies coexistence in a highly politicised rewilding context, prior to extended ethnographic fieldwork. Focusing on the figure of the “problem bear” as an analytical entry point, it examines how individual animals become classified and governed through institutional practices, legal categories, and public narratives, and how these processes shape possibilities for coexistence, care, control, and exclusion. Particular attention is paid to emerging bear biographies as sites where nonhuman agency becomes both visible and constrained within rewilding practices.

By foregrounding multispecies relations and biographical perspectives, the paper contributes to Environmental Humanities debates on alpine rewilding by highlighting the limits of abstract coexistence models and the importance of situated, more-than-human approaches to understanding conflict and transformation in mountain regions.

We are processing your request… Just a few seconds — thanks for your patience… Almost done — preparing everything for you… Huuuh… this seems to be a difficult thing 🤔 I’m not sure if I can manage this right now… Please refresh the page — I think something went wrong.
If this happens again, please get in touch with us.