FS 26.119
Water Governance in the European Alps
Details
Full Title
Europe’s Water Towers Under Pressure. Governing Hydro-Social Relations in the AlpsScheduled
TBATBAChair
Sauerwein-Schlosser, CarlottaCo-chair(s)
Ruiz Peyré, FernandoThematic Focus
Adaption, Policy, Resources, Spatial Planning, Sustainable DevelopmentKeywords
Hydro-Social Imaginaries, Waterscapes
Abstract/Description
Water is a fundamental resource for human settlement and economic activity in the Alpine region. Beyond infrastructure, social norms and legal arrangements governing water use have profoundly shaped landscapes and societal organization. Traditional irrigation systems embody the long-standing co-evolution of water, society, and territory. Such material and institutional configurations are embedded in broader narratives of water security, risk, and regional development that shape policy priorities and legitimize water management approaches.
In recent decades, water use in the Alps has diversified and intensified. Retention basins, irrigation, artificial snowmaking, and hydropower facilities increasingly reshape Alpine landscapes, altering hydrological flows and transforming the social organization of water use. However, the further expansion of such infrastructure is contested: while proponents frame these investments as essential for climate change adaptation and water security, critics highlight cumulative ecological impacts, unequal access, increasing water-related conflicts, and technocratic decision-making that reinforce path dependencies.
Against this backdrop, this session explores water use and governance in the European Alps from interdisciplinary perspectives. By integrating hydrological, social, and governance perspectives, it aims to advance a comprehensive understanding of water-related transformations under climate change. We invite empirical case studies, comparative analyses, and conceptual contributions from all disciplines that address the interplay among hydrological conditions, infrastructure development, governance arrangements, and social resilience.
Key questions include:
- What formal and informal water governance arrangements characterize Alpine regions across scales?
- How have hydrological conditions, seasonal variability, and natural storage shaped water use and infrastructure development, and how have societal interventions, in turn, transformed hydro-ecological systems over time?
- How do climate-induced changes in precipitation and natural storage affect water provision and governance today?
- Which imaginaries, narratives, norms, and policy frameworks shape water-related decision-making in the Alps?
- How can water use strategies and infrastructure projects be designed and implemented to ensure participation, evidence-based discussion, and broad consensus?
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.