FS 26.117
Evidence-based biodiversity protection in the Alps
Details
Full Title
Evidence-based biodiversity protection in the AlpsScheduled
TBATBAChair
Rüdisser, JohannesCo-chair(s)
Schönswetter, Peter; Sturmbauer, Christian; and Urbach, DavnahThematic Focus
Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, MonitoringKeywords
Monitoring, Biodiversity, LTSER, Genetic diversity, Endemism
Abstract/Description
All across Europe, the Alps represent one of the most biodiversity-rich and climate-sensitive environments in Europe. For both its richness and sensitivity, and because of rapid climate change, land-use shifts, and increasing human pressures, mountain environments need robust, evidence-based approaches to biodiversity protection. However, steep environmental gradients, high habitat heterogeneity, endemism, and pronounced seasonality not only shape the unique biodiversity patterns specific of the Alps, but at the same time pose methodological challenges for the biodiversity assessment and long-term monitoring on which management decisions should be based on.
The session focuses on the specific ecological characteristics of ecosystems in the Alps and their implications for biodiversity studies, monitoring design, and data interpretation. We will address current practices in biodiversity monitoring and data collection in alpine regions, including genetic monitoring, remote sensing, automated monitoring, and citizen science, as well as challenges related to data quality, harmonization, accessibility, and long-term management.
A central objective of the session is to foster exchange between scientists and practitioners, including protected area managers and representatives of environmental authorities. Contributions that demonstrate successful collaborations, co-designed monitoring schemes, or practical applications of scientific results in conservation planning and management are especially encouraged.
The session further calls for contributions aimed at establishing common, interchangeable, and scalable approaches for biodiversity monitoring across the Alps. This includes harmonized indicators, standardized protocols, and interoperable data infrastructures that enable comparison across regions and support coordinated conservation strategies.
Finally, we invite contributions highlighting the role of Long-Term Ecosystem and socio-ecological Research (LTSER) in mountain environments. Studies using long-term datasets, long-term monitoring programs, adaptive monitoring and management approaches, and methodological advances that improve the detection of trends, or the evaluation of conservation measures under ongoing environmental change are particularly welcome.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.