WS 26.101
Local governance of quality of life for the Alpine-wide roadmap
Details
Full Title
Alpine-wide roadmap addressing the role of local governance for better quality of life - Insights from the AlpsScheduled
TBATBAChair
Jarosch, JulikaCo-chair(s)
Mosdale, Lauren; Marot, Naja; Petrović Jesenovec, Pina Klara; Berisha, Erblin; Ay Betul, Cemre; and Gasteiger, KatharinaThematic Focus
Policy, Sustainable DevelopmentKeywords
quality of life, governance, participation
Abstract/Description
Quality of life (QoL) figures among the societal concepts without a clear and standardised definition. Thus, each research study grasps the concept differently: either it undertakes a comprehensive approach and investigates all QoL aspects, or it looks into the specific elements, one of them being the governance. The Interreg GOVQoL project aims to elaborate on the local governance of quality of life in the Alpine countries Austria, France, Germany, Italy and Slovenia. For this purpose, the QoL concept from the 10th Report on the State of the Alps was adapted to the local level. This was done by performing interviews with the representatives of the municipal administration and other forms of local organisations like local action groups, union of municipalities, associations and regional parks. The questions focused on the existing policies to support quality of life, identification of stakeholders engaged in policy making, projects municipalities implement for better QoL, existing monitoring systems, and other governance-related questions. Results show that territories, either implicitly or explicitly, activate measures (projects, policies, strategies) aimed at improving QoL. However, the ways in which QoL is addressed vary according to the different institutional arrangements, geographical conditions, the distribution of responsibilities, and local capacities – particularly economic and human resources. During workshops with selected local communities in the Alps, in which the concept was discussed more into depth with the local representatives, problems were identified, and solutions sought for. Based on the workshops, 10 roadmaps were prepared to guide the municipalities towards better governance. As several challenges to govern QoL are shared and so are potential solutions, a joint Alpine roadmap will be developed. This alpine-wide roadmap will include guidelines on how communities can intensify sensitivity to QoL in their governance framework, which objectives they should follow, and what instruments they should implement in this regard.
As one of the inputs to create the Alpine roadmap, this workshop is proposed. As an introduction into the discussion, the findings of the interviews will be presented, as will be the first outcomes of the local road maps. The regional MRC offers a great opportunity to address the relevant stakeholders and to discuss with them in participative manner the potential content of the roadmap.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.