Andreas Flora

WS 26.105

The potential of alpine territories for planning under net-zero land take

Session status: Accepted
Content last updated: 2026-04-17 12:19:38
Online available since: 2025-12-17 12:13:11

Details

  • Full Title

    Thinking outside the permanent settlement area
  • Scheduled

    TBA
    TBA
  • Chair

    Flora, Andreas
  • Co-chair(s)

    Gogl, Alexander
  • Thematic Focus

    Architecture, Mobility, Policy, Spatial Planning, Tourism
  • Keywords

    net-zero land take, alpine urbanisation, permanent settlement area, cable-cars

Abstract/Description

Inner-alpine land is under stress from conflicting land uses like agriculture, industry, housing, and traffic corridors. The transformation of the energy sector to renewables and the need to improve ecosystem services further increase this demand for land. Most of this demand focuses on the permanent settlement area (PSA), which covers roughly 12% of the territory of Tyrol. In most cases, this is met by transforming fertile agricultural land or forests, decreasing the ecological value of the region.

The PSA is the major reference point in discussions about land consumption and the brokering of land by public authorities. However, it is often overlooked, that the technical infrastructure already reaches beyond its perimeter, to access and transform alpine territories outside the PSA. The archipelago of areas outside the PSA is typically functionally programmed by single-use cases like energy storage or ski resorts, resulting in low utilisation rates of the occupied land. Climate warming even threatens to bring an end to some of the latter cases, leaving extensive, serviced footprints with low ecological value wasted.

Many ski resorts are already adapting to a post-ski era, while alpine countries implement limits to the growth of settlements in the valleys, giving more priority to the protection of agricultural and natural land use. The EU has set a net-zero land take goal for 2050. Moreover, cable cars become more widely used as an everyday mode of mass transportation in urban settings. All in all, this is a good time to take a step back and ask about the future relationship between the PSA and its extended territory and the potential it might have for regional development:

  1. How can planning integrate the archipelago of serviced areas beyond the PSA to release pressure from valley floors? Are the existing instruments sufficient for that?
  2. What functions, social configurations, economic models or building types could thrive there?
  3. What would this mean for existing land uses like pastures and alpine ecosystems, and how could they benefit?
  4. How could this be a driver for re-naturalising land in the valleys and opening up ecosystem corridors to improve biodiversity alpine-wide?
  5. How viable would such a scheme be in the face of increasing natural hazards, induced by climate-change?

This session invites stakeholders, experts, and practitioners to think outside the PSA’s boundaries.

This session is part of the research project “BrokeringSpaces”, which is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union through the Interreg Alpine Space programme 2021-2027.

Registered Abstracts

ID: 3.47

The Future of Ski Resorts on the Last Snow – Temporary Mountain Settlements, Climate Exposure and Spatial Conflict

Maria Novotna
Kalinová, Andrea

Abstract/Description

Ski resorts are among the most climate-exposed forms of temporary settlement. Designed around the ephemeral presence of snow, they occupy fragile mountain environments while relying on extensive infrastructure to support seasonal habitation and mass tourism. As climate change accelerates, ski resorts have become sites of a persistent land-use conflict, where tourism-driven development increasingly confronts ecological limits and conservation priorities of the islands of snow and wilderness.

Mountain terrain became a technical and cultural challenge, with architecture expressing human ambition in extreme environments. While community-based ski areas remained tied to permanent settlements at lower altitudes, large resorts detached themselves and imposed permanent landscape modification and fragmentation through high-altitude mountain urbanism. Climate change is now destabilising this model: declining snowfall and rising temperatures are eliminating many community ski areas, forcing the spatial concentration of winter recreation and intensifying ecological and urban pressures within the large ski resorts.

This paper asks what future awaits large ski resorts if these climatic trends persist. Will they transform into seasonal bike parks, become abandoned settlements, or evolve into new forms of human-nature coexistence more attuned to fragile mountain environments? It further questions whether technological or spatial innovation could enable mountain recreation to exist beyond the disappearance of natural snow without further disturbing sensitive ecosystems, or whether the very premise of ski resort development must be reconsidered.

Drawing on historical analysis and comparative case studies, the paper presents different architectural, urbanistic, and landscape-planning approaches to seasonal mountain settlements, discussing why some models proved resilient while others failed. This contribution argues that rethinking areas beyond permanent settlement requires understanding the historical and natural layers sedimented within them. Mountains have long served as sites of experiment—testing architecture, infrastructure, and human capability. Faced with the consequences, the paper reframes the question of the “last snow” not as a technological problem, but as a theoretical challenge: how architecture and planning might engage with temporary settlement, environmental limits, and coexistence without territorial exploitation.

Submitted Abstracts

Abstracts are only visible to (co-)chairs at the moment. Please log in with your account to see this list.

We are processing your request… Just a few seconds — thanks for your patience… Almost done — preparing everything for you… Huuuh… this seems to be a difficult thing 🤔 I’m not sure if I can manage this right now… Please refresh the page — I think something went wrong.
If this happens again, please get in touch with us.