FS 26.121
Alpine carbon and nutrient dynamics
Session includes ...
Carbon, nutrient and water cycling in alpine peatlands and wetlandsAlpine carbon dynamics: measurements, models and processes
Details
Full Title
Alpine carbon and nutrient dynamicsScheduled
TBATBAChair
Magnani, MartaCo-chair(s)
van Grinsven, Sigrid; Vivaldo, Gianna; Platter, Alexander; and Saponaro, VincenzoThematic Focus
Ecosystems, Modeling, MonitoringKeywords
Alpine carbon dynamics, Soil nutrient cycling, Climate change impacts, Greenhouse gas fluxes
Abstract/Description
The European Alps are undergoing rapid climatic and environmental changes that are strongly affecting regional carbon and nutrient dynamics across a wide range of ecosystems, including peatlands, wetlands, forests, grasslands and glacier forelands. Carbon stocks and fluxes, as well as nutrient cycling, are highly heterogeneous, shaped by steep climatic gradients, complex topography, land-use history, and hydrological controls. For instance, recent findings highlight that alpine peatlands are more widespread than previously assumed and represent important long-term carbon reservoirs, while alpine wetlands may function as dynamic and transitional systems. However, how differing Alpine ecosystems will respond to warming, altered precipitation regimes, cryospheric change, and land-use pressures, remains insufficiently understood.
This session brings together experts working on all facets of carbon and nutrient dynamics in Alpine soils, including both high and low elevation sites. We welcome contributions presenting new estimates of carbon stocks in vegetation and soils, measurements of greenhouse gas fluxes (e.g. CO₂ , CH₄ or N2O), emergent remote-sensing approaches, studies focused on below-ground hydrology, soil biogeochemistry, microbiology or vegetation dynamics. We also encourage submissions presenting monitoring networks, and modelling frameworks aimed at upscaling observations, quantifying uncertainties, and projecting future trajectories under changing climate and land-use scenarios. By integrating observational, experimental, and modelling perspectives, the session aims to foster interdisciplinary exchange and improve understanding of the current and future soil dynamics of the Alpine Region.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.