WS 26.100
Bridging science and practice in mountain hazard risk management
Session status: Accepted
Content last updated: 2026-04-14 22:33:17
Online available since: 2025-12-14 20:07:12
Details
Full Title
Bridging science and practice: Co-producing knowledge for mountain hazard risk management in the European AlpsScheduled
TBATBAChair
Keiler, MargrethCo-chair(s)
Gallmetzer, Willigis; Walter, Gebhard; and Fuchs, SvenThematic Focus
Natural HazardsKeywords
Knowledge co-production, Climate change adaptation, Vulnerabilities, Exposure, Natural hazard risk
Abstract/Description
This workshop strengthens the interface between science and practice in mountain hazard risk management, promoting mutual learning between researchers and practitioners. Focusing on how scientific knowledge and practical experience can be combined to address the impact of climate change on mountain risks in the European Alps, the workshop moves beyond a narrow focus on hazards, explicitly including exposure and vulnerability.
Scientific research indicates that changes in land use, socio-economic development, and governance structures often play a key role in determining future risk. Science can support practice by improving the assessment of exposure and vulnerability dynamics across spatial and temporal scales, and by providing scenario-based approaches that are aligned with climate projections and SSPs.
Conversely, practitioners can contribute valuable insights that are often lacking in scientific research. Local authorities and civil protection agencies can provide insights into institutional constraints, the challenges of implementation, informal practices, and the effectiveness of existing adaptation measures. Integrating this experiential knowledge is crucial for better representing the social and institutional dimensions of vulnerability.
The workshop emphasises the co-production of knowledge through dialogue between science and practice. It explores how different methods and areas of expertise can be combined to inform adaptive risk management strategies. By encouraging dialogue between different disciplines and sectors, the workshop aims to promote adaptive, context-sensitive risk management and strengthen climate resilience in the Alps.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.