FS 26.101
Managing Pathways toward Social Sustainability in Mountain Destinations
Details
Full Title
Community Consideration, Responsibility, and Accessibility: Innovative Management Pathways for Socially Sustainable Destination TransformationScheduled
TBATBAChair
Pikkemaat, BirgitCo-chair(s)
Nigg, Joachim; Schönherr, Sarah; and Peters, MikeThematic Focus
Adaption, Equality, Spatial Planning, Sustainable Development, TourismKeywords
Accessible tourism, Tourism governance, Stakeholder interaction, Residents, Socially sustainable tourism
Abstract/Description
This session advances knowledge on the social dimension of sustainable tourism development by analysing transformations to community-focused, accessible, and inclusive approaches in mountain destinations. Special emphasis is placed on small, spatially constrained communities, including analyses of tourism impacts on everyday life and local infrastructure, as well as its implications for destination planning under limited resources (e.g., space, housing, labour, and public services). Possible contributions may engage with (but are not limited to) the following research avenues: Governance and community voice: Analyses on how governance arrangements and co-design processes shape representation, legitimacy, and decision-making, particularly where external interests are at the core while local priorities are neglected. Accessibility and inclusion in tourism: Examinations on how mountain destination stakeholders address accessible tourism. This includes both social perceptions for- and self-perceptions of people with disability and the allocation of responsibilities across public/private actors throughout the implementation of accessible tourism. Responsibility for sustainable tourism development: Examining how different stakeholders in mountain destinations perceive and approach sustainable tourism development. Who is responsible for implementing sustainability, and how do various actors demonstrate responsible behavior? Managing concentrated pressures and social impacts: Investigations of stakeholder reactions to crowding in sensitive settings (e.g., thresholds and zoning, benefit-sharing, community-led initiatives, reinvestment in local infrastructure). This refers to social impacts of over-tourism on cohesion or residents’ everyday wellbeing, defining approaches to assess and address these. Resident – tourist interactions: Encounters between residents and tourists create reciprocal influences that shape how residents experience their community in different roles. These interactions form a core component of the overall experience for both groups, shaping tourists’ perceptions of the destination and fostering loyalty, while also determining residents’ support for tourism development.
By integrating these perspectives, the session will enhance discussions on stakeholder interests in the evolution of socially sustainable tourism in mountain regions.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.