LS 26.101
Mountain hazard risk dynamics beyond climate change
Session includes ...
Mountain hazards: understanding key risk drivers beyond climate changeNavigating Land Use Competition and Systemic Risks in Mountain Regions
Details
Full Title
Mountain hazard risk dynamics: Land use, systemic interactions and impact-based approaches beyond climate changeScheduled
TBATBAChair
Schlögl, MatthiasCo-chair(s)
Fontanella Pisa, Paola; Fuchs, Sven; Imgrüth, Dominik; Keiler, Margreth; Mayer, Andreas; Polderman, Annemarie; Posch, Eva; Schneiderbauer, Stefan; Steger, Stefan; and Lamprecht, ChristianThematic Focus
Adaption, Modeling, Natural Hazards, PolicyKeywords
Mountain hazard risk, Adaptation, Exposure, Impact, Vulnerability
Abstract/Description
Mountain regions worldwide are experiencing rising losses from natural hazards. While climate change intensifies many hazard processes, shifting exposure, evolving land use, and changing vulnerability patterns are equally powerful – and often underexamined – drivers of risk. At the same time, competing land uses and socio-economic transformations are reshaping mountain socio-ecological systems, creating new constellations of systemic and cascading risks. This session brings together research that advances a comprehensive understanding of mountain risk dynamics by linking hazard processes, land use change, exposure and vulnerability evolution, and impact-based modelling approaches.
We invite interdisciplinary contributions that address one or more of the following themes:
- Evolving exposure and vulnerability across spatial and temporal scales, including improved datasets, empirical validation, and integration of institutional and socio-economic dimensions.
- Land use competition, trade-offs and conflicts (e.g., tourism, hydropower, agriculture, forestry, settlement expansion) and their role in generating, redistributing, or transforming natural hazard risk.
- Systemic and cascading risks in mountain socio-ecological systems, including cross-sectoral and cross-scale interactions.
- Impact-based and integrative modelling approaches, linking hydro-meteorological drivers, terrain and land cover, exposure, vulnerability, and runout dynamics to deliver spatially explicit risk assessments and scenario-based analyses.
- Warning value chains and decision support, including threshold evaluation, uncertainty communication, true/false alarm trade-offs, and risk-oriented early warning.
- Scenario tools and forward-looking approaches, such as SSP-aligned assessments, agent-based models, participatory methods, and nature-based solutions to support adaptive governance.
- Empirical analyses of loss trends, disentangling the roles of climate change, exposure dynamics, land use decisions, and mitigation measures.
We particularly encourage contributions that bridge natural and social sciences, and that connect process understanding with decision-making and policy relevance. Comparative case studies from Alpine and other mountain regions are welcome. The session aims to foster dialogue between scientists, practitioners, and policymakers to support adaptive, impact-oriented risk management.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.