FS 26.111
Integrating nature-based solutions to enhance resilience in mountain farming
Details
Full Title
Pathways to resilient agricultural landscapes in mountain regions: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable farmingScheduled
TBATBAChair
Simion, HeidiCo-chair(s)
Klebl, Fabian; and Egarter Vigl, LukasThematic Focus
No focus definedKeywords
Agricultural landscapes, Ecosystem services, Nature-based solutions, Socio-ecological systems, Spatial scales
Abstract/Description
Agricultural production in mountain regions poses a significant threat to the integrity of ecosystems and the natural environment, demanding urgent action to ensure the resilience of these sensitive landscapes. Today, the interplay and effects of several environmental, agronomic, and socio-economic pressures increasingly undermine not only the long-term sustainability but also the cultural heritage they embody. At the same time, mounting evidence shows that biodiversity and nature-based solutions, ranging from within-field plant community management to landscape-scale compositional and configurational diversification, can leverage ecological processes, enhance ecosystem service-based multifunctionality and strengthen the sustainability and resilience of these landscapes.
For the session “Pathways to resilient agricultural landscapes in mountain regions: Integrating nature-based solutions for sustainable farming”, we invite contributions that explore and demonstrate how biodiversity, stakeholder-driven, and multi-scale nature-based interventions can foster more integrated, diversified and multifunctional agricultural landscapes. We especially encourage submissions that adopt inter- and transdisciplinary approaches and incorporate stakeholder perspectives, including those of farmers, consultants, cooperatives, policymakers, and local communities, whose knowledge, priorities, and constraints are crucial for the design, adoption, and long-term success of nature-based strategies.
We welcome empirical, modelling, conceptual, and policy-oriented work that identifies knowledge gaps, evaluates ecosystem service outcomes, proposes and test innovative and nature-based solutions, or provides multi-actor and cross-scale insights to support and enhance the resilience, adaptive capacity and multiple benefits in agriculture-dominated socio-ecological systems in mountain regions.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.