FS 26.112
Mountain lakes and ponds under human pressure and global threats
Details
Full Title
Sentinels at risk: monitoring, conservation, and management challenges for mountain lakes and ponds under human pressures and global changeScheduled
TBATBAChair
Rogora, MichelaCo-chair(s)
Tolotti, Monica; Sommaruga, Ruben; Tiberti, Rocco; and Brighenti, StefanoThematic Focus
Climate, Cryo- & Hydrosphere, Ecosystems, Monitoring, TourismKeywords
Mountain freshwater, Biodiversity, Pollutants, Climate change, Overtourism
Abstract/Description
High mountain lakes and ponds provide essential ecosystem services and have a high conservation and aesthetic value. Due to their specific features, they may host specialized communities with still partly unknown ecology and biodiversity. They are also particularly sensitive to environmental stressors and are considered sentinels of global change. Mountain freshwaters are also extremely sensitive to climate change, being affected by increasing temperature, changing precipitation regime, and cryosphere thawing, with related impact on water quality and habitat conditions.
Although often considered pristine systems, lakes and ponds in high-altitude regions are threatened by both local and global anthropogenic pressures, which in many cases can compromise their ecological integrity, affect water quality and exacerbate conflict of interest for their use. Among local pressures, the increasing touristic pressure in many mountain areas represents an additional threat to mountain lakes, adding to the pervasive presence of fish introductions and livestock grazing: unsustainable recreational use may affect trophic status and ecological functioning of lakes by increasing nutrient loads and the level of emerging pollutants, whose toxic effects are still poorly understood. The potential or already evident effects of human pressure are even more relevant for freshwater systems not included in protected areas or not subject to any environmental legislation.
The combined effects of several pressures, including overtourism and water exploitation for different uses, need to be assessed through proper indicators. Research and monitoring programs, as well as restoration and conservation plans, should consider the interaction of different pressures and combine various approaches, from in-situ data collection, to remote sensing and modelling. Also, citizen science and other initiatives of participatory science may contribute to better knowledge and to raise awareness about the importance and vulnerability of freshwater ecosystems.
This session welcomes contribution from different disciplines and perspectives, possibly combining interdisciplinary approaches and focusing on the emerging threats to mountain lakes and ponds due to the increasing and changing nature of human activities in mountain areas. The objective is to share results and/or approaches and stimulate the discussion.
Submitted Abstracts
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.
- If you are not yet logged-in, please log in to your My#Conf environment
- Click “Submissions” and select the session you want to review (you need to be chair or co-chair to see the session and the submissions to the session) by clicking on the “external link” symbol:
- On the selected session page, scroll down to get to the section “Submitted abstracts”.
-> this list shows all abstracts submitted to your session.
-> each line shows one abstract - To get to the review section, please click on the “eye” symbol: of the abstract.
-> the abstract expands and new sections (First author, Co-author(s) and description) appear.
-> additional, the abstract review area appears below the abstract content. - The review area gives you now a new panel to adjust:
FOR CO-CHAIRS
-> dropdown menu to set a review recommendation (you can overwrite this recommendation as often as you want)
-> optional: comments to share with your chair-colleagues and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can change your review (incl. comments) for an abstract as often as you want until the chair makes the final decision. Changes are overwritten and not archived.
FOR CHAIRS
-> checkbox to set your final review (when activated, you confirm your final choice and will close the review process of this abstract)
-> optional: comments to share with your co-chair(s) and the organizing committee (max. 50 characters, not visible for the authors of the abstract)
INFO: You can leave comments without making your final review as often as you want. Changes are overwritten and not archived. When activating the checkbox, you make your final review and close the review process for this abstract. In case of an erroneous review, you can of course contact us via contact form (please provide the abstract number). You can do the review no matter if your co-chair(s) have already submitted a review recommendation or not.
Details of the used icons/symbols
Once the review of the abstract is completed by the chair, this icon appears.
If at least one review/comment has been provided by the co-chair, this icon appears.
If at least one comment has been provided by the (co-)chair(s), this icon appears.